USA v. Antwon Stuckey, No. 16-16888 (11th Cir. 2017)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Case: 16-16888 Date Filed: 06/20/2017 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 16-16888 Non-Argument Calendar ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 8:10-cr-00211-VMC-MAP-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ANTWON STUCKEY, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida ________________________ (June 20, 2017) Before TJOFLAT, HULL, and WILLIAM PRYOR Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Robert Godfrey, appointed counsel for Antwon Stuckey, in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the Case: 16-16888 Date Filed: 06/20/2017 Page: 2 of 2 appellant, because, in his opinion, the appeal is without merit. Counsel has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Stuckey’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.