USA v. Darius Brightwell, No. 16-13045 (11th Cir. 2017)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Case: 16-13045 Date Filed: 02/27/2017 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 16-13045 Non-Argument Calendar ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 3:15-cr-00010-CAR-CHW-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus DARIUS BRIGHTWELL, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia ________________________ (February 27, 2017) Before MARTIN, ANDERSON and BLACK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Daniel S. Woodrum, appointed counsel for Darius Brightwell, in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant, because, in his opinion, the appeal is without merit. Counsel has filed a Case: 16-13045 Date Filed: 02/27/2017 Page: 2 of 2 brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Brightwell’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.