USA v. Florence Chigozie Nna, Rodney Eugene Hill, No. 13-12196 (11th Cir. 2014)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Case: 13-12196 Date Filed: 04/29/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 13-12196 Non-Argument Calendar ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 1:12-cr-00166-CG-C-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus FLORENCE CHIGOZIE NNA, RODNEY EUGENE HILL, Defendants-Appellants. ________________________ Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama ________________________ (April 29, 2014) Before HULL, MARCUS and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Paul D. Brown, appointed counsel for Rodney Eugene Hill in this direct Case: 13-12196 Date Filed: 04/29/2014 Page: 2 of 2 criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). J. Clark Stankowski, appointed counsel for Florence Chigozie Nna in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396. Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsels motions to withdraw are GRANTED, and Hills s and Nna s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
