United States v. Jimenez, No. 11-15039 (11th Cir. 2013)
Annotate this CaseDefendant appealed his conviction for intentionally misapplying $5,000 or more from an organization receiving in excess of $10,000 in federal funds in a one-year period, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 666. Defendant argued that there was insufficient evidence to support his conviction. Defendant had failed to disclose a conflict of interest stemming from his wife's transaction with his place of employment. The court held that no reasonable construction of the evidence presented at trial permitted a finding that defendant intentionally misapplied funds and therefore, the court reversed his conviction.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.