Weeks vs. McKune, No. 06-3228 (10th Cir. 2006)

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES CO URT O F APPEALS October 11, 2006 TENTH CIRCUIT Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court JOHN L. W EEK S, Petitioner-A ppellant, No. 06-3228 v. District of Kansas DA VID R . M cKU NE and PHILL KLINE, (D.C. No. 05-CV-3322-JTM ) Respondents-Appellees. OR DER * Before M U RPH Y, SE YM OU R, and M cCO NNELL, Circuit Judges. John L. W eeks, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, seeks a certificate of appealability (COA) that would allow him to appeal the district court s order denying his habeas corpus petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A). Because we conclude that M r. W eeks has failed to make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, we DENY his request for a COA and dismiss the appeal. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). * This order is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. M r. W eeks was convicted in Kansas state court of kidnaping, rape, and criminal sodomy of three women in three separate incidents. The Kansas Court of Appeals affirmed the convictions, but vacated an upward departure under the state sentencing guidelines. The Kansas Supreme Court denied review. After unsuccessfully pursuing state habeas relief, culminating in a denial of review by the Kansas Supreme Court on June 5, 2005, M r. W eeks filed this petition in July 2005. M r. W eeks raised three issues: (1) that exclusion of alibi evidence for failure to comply with state procedural notice rules violated his right to present a defense under the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments; (2) that the evidence was insufficient to show that he had accomplished the kidnapings by means of force, threat, or deception; and (3) that he had received ineffective assistance of counsel. One of his claims of ineffective assistance, which was also brought as an independent claim and addressed by the district court as such, see M emorandum & Order, at 15, was based on prosecutorial misconduct and defense counsel s failure to object to it. W e have carefully examined M r. W eeks s Application fora Certificate of Appealability, the M emorandum and Order of the district court, and the record, and conclude, for substantially the reasons stated by the district court, that no reasonable jurist could find that M r. W eeks has satisfied the criteria for a COA. -2- Accordingly, we D EN Y John L. W eeks request for a COA and DISM ISS this appeal. Petitioner s motion to proceed in form a pauperis is also DENIED. Entered for the Court, M ichael W . M cConnell Circuit Judge -3-

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.