Milward v. Rust-Oleum Corp., No. 13-2132 (1st Cir. 2016)
Annotate this CaseBrian Milward and his wife sued, among other defendants, Rust-Oleum Corporation alleging that Defendants’ negligence caused Milward’s Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia. To succeed against Rust-Oleum, the Milwards had the burden of establishing general and specific causation through expert testimony. The district court excluded the Milwards’ general causation expert and entered judgment in favor of Defendants. The First Circuit reversed and remanded for the trial court to consider the issue of specific causation. The district court ultimately excluded the testimony of Plaintiffs’ specific causation expert. Because the Milwards could not establish specific causation without this testimony, the district court granted summary judgment in favor of Rust-Oleum. The First Circuit affirmed, holding (1) the district court did not err in excluding the specific causation expert's testimony because the analysis was unreliable; and (2) once the district court excluded the expert testimony, it correctly granted Rust-Oleum’s motion for summary judgment.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.