United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Steven Emile Holloway, Defendant-appellant, 98 F.3d 1347 (9th Cir. 1996)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 98 F.3d 1347 (9th Cir. 1996) Submitted Oct. 7, 1996. *Decided Oct. 10, 1996

Before: BEEZER, KOZINSKI, and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM^**

Steven Emile Holloway appeals the 78-month sentence imposed following his plea of guilty to armed bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a), (d). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Holloway's counsel filed a brief stating that he finds no meritorious issues for review, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83 (1988), discloses no issue for review. Accordingly, the motion of counsel to withdraw is GRANTED and the district court's judgment is AFFIRMED.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.