In Re Seagate Technology Ii Securities Litigation.michael F. Anderson, on Behalf of Himself and the Certifiedclass of Purchasers of Common Stock of Seagatetechnology Inc., Plaintiff-appellant, v. Seagate Technology; Alan Shugart; David Charles Mitchell;donald Waite; Douglas Mahon, Defendants-appellees, 98 F.3d 1346 (9th Cir. 1996)

 Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 98 F.3d 1346 (9th Cir. 1996) Argued and Submitted Sept. 18, 1996. Decided Oct. 2, 1996

Before: CHOY, CANBY, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM* 

Michael F. Anderson, on behalf of himself and a class of investors, appeals the district court's determinations which dismissed part of and granted summary judgment on the remainder of his securities fraud action against Seagate Technology Inc. and certain of its officers (Seagate). He contends that Seagate, a generally successful company, violated the securities law during a limited period in 1988, which caused those investors to lose money when the market dipped.

We have carefully reviewed the record and the district court's orders, which thoroughly and convincingly discuss and dispose of the issues in this case. See Memorandum and Order of June 19, 1990 (Judge Patel) and Order of February 18, 1995 (Judge Walker). We affirm for the reasons given by the district court in those orders.

AFFIRMED.

 *

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.