James Ludlow, Petitioner-appellant, v. Teresa Rocha, Warden; Attorney General of the State Ofcalifornia, Respondents-appellees, 98 F.3d 1346 (9th Cir. 1996)

 Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 98 F.3d 1346 (9th Cir. 1996) Submitted Oct. 7, 1996. *Decided Oct. 11, 1996

Before: BEEZER, KOZINSKI and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM** 

We affirm for the reasons stated in the magistrate judge's Findings and Recommendation, filed on August 11, 1995, which was adopted in full by the district court's Order filed on October 18, 1995.1 

AFFIRMED.

 *

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4. Accordingly, Ludlow's request for appointment of counsel for oral argument is denied

 **

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

 1

Because of our disposition of this appeal, we do not consider the applicability, if any, of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214 (1996), to this appeal

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.