Shong-ching Tong, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Fdic, As Receiver for Assured Thrift and Loan Association,defendant-appellee, 98 F.3d 1346 (9th Cir. 1996)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 98 F.3d 1346 (9th Cir. 1996) Submitted Oct. 7, 1996. *Decided Oct. 9, 1996

Before: BEEZER, KOZINSKI, and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM^**

Shong-Ching Tong appeals pro se the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation ("FDIC") in his action brought under the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act, 12 U.S.C. § 1821(d) (3)-(13). Tong sought damages for conversion, malicious prosecution, and intentional infliction of emotional distress against the FDIC as receiver of and successor to the failed Assured Thrift and Loan Association. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Kruso v. International Tel. & Tel. Corp., 872 F.2d 1416, 1421 (9th Cir. 1989), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 937 (1990), and we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court in its order filed March 23, 1995.

We have considered Tong's remaining contentions and we conclude that they lack merit.

AFFIRMED.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.