Notice: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) States That Citation of Unpublished Dispositions is Disfavored Except for Establishing Res Judicata, Estoppel, or the Law of the Case and Requires Service of Copies of Cited Unpublished Dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.darrin Dewayne Brummett, Plaintiff--appellant,andscott Wilkinson; Michael A. Cosentino; Ronnie B. Sharpe;don R. Smith; Darrly A. Dixon; Lamar Deshawn Mullins;daniel Id-deen; Lonnie Thompson; Michael Peterson, A/k/alarry G. Arrington, Plaintiffs, v. James Mccauley, Defendant--appellee.lamar Deshawn Mullins, Plaintiff--appellant,anddarrin Dewayne Brummett; Scott Wilkinson; Michael A.cosentino; Ronnie B. Sharpe; Don R. Smith; Darrly A.dixon; Daniel Id-deen; Lonnie Thompson; Michael Peterson,a/k/a Larry G. Arrington, Plaintiffs, v. James Mccauley, Defendant--appellee, 92 F.3d 1177 (4th Cir. 1996)
Annotate this CaseAppeals from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (CA-95-3262-3-20BC).
Darrin DeWayne Brummett, Lamar Deshawn Mullins, Appellants Pro Se.
D.S.C.
AFFIRMED.
Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellants appeal from the district court's order denying relief on their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Brummett v. McCauley, No. CA-95-3262-3-20BC (D.S.C. Nov. 8, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
