United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Craig Lawrence Thomas, Defendant-appellant, 9 F.3d 1545 (4th Cir. 1993)

Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 9 F.3d 1545 (4th Cir. 1993) Submitted: October 25, 1993. Decided: November 15, 1993

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.

Craig Lawrence Thomas, Appellant Pro Se.

Gary Patrick Jordan, United States Attorney, Raymond Allen Bonner, Assistant United States Attorney, for Appellee.

D. Md.

DISMISSED

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and PHILLIPS and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:


OPINION

Appellant noted this appeal outside the sixty-day appeal period established by Fed. R. App. P. 4(a) (1), failed to obtain an extension of the appeal period within the additional thirty-day period provided by Fed. R. App. P. 4(a) (5), and is not entitled to relief under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a) (6). The time periods established by Fed. R. App. P. 4 are "mandatory and jurisdictional." Browder v. Director, Dep't of Corrections, 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson, 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). Appellant's failure to note a timely appeal or obtain an extension of the appeal period deprives this Court of jurisdiction to consider this case. We therefore dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.