United States of America, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Herman Resnick, Defendant-appellee, 87 F.3d 1324 (9th Cir. 1996)

 Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 87 F.3d 1324 (9th Cir. 1996) Submitted June 11, 1996. Decided June 19, 1996

Before: REINHARDT, HALL, Circuit Judges. MERHIGE, District Judge.* 

MEMORANDUM** 

The government appeals the district court's order granting defendant's motion to suppress his statement. We have jurisdiction under 18 U.S.C. § 3731.

This appeal is controlled by our recent holding in United States v. Herring, 95-10521, slip opinion at 5733 (9th Cir. May 13, 1996). Accordingly, we VACATE the district court order and REMAND for further proceedings. In so doing, we express no opinion as to whether the method by which the Assistant United States Attorney proposes to locate and identify Brady material in this particular case satisfies the requirements of United States v. Henthorn, 931 F.2d 29 (9th Cir. 1991).

VACATED and REMANDED.

 *

The Honorable Robert R. Merhige, Jr., Senior United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Virginia, sitting by designation

 **

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.