Notice: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) States That Citation of Unpublished Dispositions is Disfavored Except for Establishing Res Judicata, Estoppel, or the Law of the Case and Requires Service of Copies of Cited Unpublished Dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.cumis Insurance Society, Incorporated, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Mark A. Riley, Defendant-appellant.no., 86 F.3d 1149 (4th Cir. 1996)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 86 F.3d 1149 (4th Cir. 1996) Submitted: May 7, 1996. Decided: May 21, 1996

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T.S. Ellis, III, District Judge. (CA-95-1024-A)

Mark A. Riley, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Sanborn Owen, MILES & STOCKBRIDGE, Fairfax, VA, for Appellee.

E.D. Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before HAMILTON, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:


Appellant appeals from the district court's orders granting summary judgment to CUMIS Insurance Society, Inc., on Count One of a Complaint charging Appellant with fraud; granting the Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a) (2) motion of CUMIS to dismiss Count Two, which alleged breach of fiduciary duty; and granting the motion of CUMIS to dismiss Appellant's counterclaim. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. CUMIS Ins. Soc'y v. Riley, No. CA-95-1024-A (E.D. Va. Nov. 8, 1995). We deny the motion for stay pending appeal and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.