Reginald Wheeler, Plaintiff-appellant, v. R. Calhoun, Defendant-appellee, 85 F.3d 639 (9th Cir. 1996)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 85 F.3d 639 (9th Cir. 1996) Submitted April 30, 1996. *Decided May 6, 1996

Before: BROWNING, REINHARDT and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM^**

Reginald Wheeler, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his action against prison psychologist R. Calhoun as barred by the doctrine of res judicata. He also appeals the district court's denial of his motion to remand his action to state court. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm for the reasons set forth in the district court's order filed June 22, 1995.

AFFIRMED.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.