Eunice Parquet; Richard Parquet, Plaintiffs-appellants, v. Xerox Corporation Board of Directors, Defendant-appellee, 83 F.3d 428 (9th Cir. 1996)

Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 83 F.3d 428 (9th Cir. 1996) Submitted April 22, 1996. *Decided April 26, 1996

Before: HALL, THOMPSON, and RYMER, Circuit Judges.


MEMORANDUM** 

Richard and Eunice Parquet appeal pro se the district court's dismissal under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b) (6) of their complaint as time-barred by the statute of limitations. We review de novo, Stone v. Travelers Corp., 58 F.3d 434, 436-37 (9th Cir. 1995), and affirm for the reasons stated in the district court's order filed July 7, 1995.

AFFIRMED.

 *

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4

 **

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.