Alberto M. Mendez, Petitioner-appellant, v. James H. Gomez; Attorney General of the State Ofcalifornia, Respondents-appellees, 83 F.3d 428 (9th Cir. 1996)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 83 F.3d 428 (9th Cir. 1996) Submitted April 10, 1996. *Decided April 12, 1996

Before: HALL, THOMPSON, and RYMER, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM^**

We review de novo, Grady v. United States, 929 F.2d 468, 470 (9th Cir. 1991), and affirm for the reasons stated in the magistrate judge's report and recommendation filed on December 14, 1994 and adopted by the district court on January 9, 1995.

AFFIRMED.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.