Ocie M. Williams, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Monumental General Insurance Company; Chrysler Creditcorporation, Defendants-appellees, 8 F.3d 823 (4th Cir. 1993)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Fayetteville.
Ocie M. Williams, Appellant Pro Se.
John Elisha Raper, Jr., McCoy, Weaver, Wiggins, Cleveland & Raper, Stephen Blayne Brown, Brown & Bunch, for Appellees.
E.D.N.C.
AFFIRMED
Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
OPINION
Ocie M. Williams appeals from the district court's denial of his motion to withdraw from an agreement settling his diversity action. We agree with the district court's conclusion that Williams has not provided adequate reasons to justify allowing him to withdraw from the agreement. See Petty v. Timken Corp., 849 F.2d 130, 134 (4th Cir. 1988). We therefore affirm the decision of the district court.* We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
In reaching this decision, we assume the existence of diversity of citizenship between Williams and Monumental General Insurance Co
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
