United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Abel Parama Borromeo, Defendant-appellant, 8 F.3d 821 (4th Cir. 1993)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Charleston. Charles H. Haden, II, Chief District Judge. (CR-89-241, CA-92-902)
Abel Parama Borromeo, Appellant Pro Se.
Phillip Blair Scott, Office of the United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.
S.D. W.Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before RUSSELL and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
OPINION
Abel Parama Borromeo appeals from the district court's order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion, and the order denying his motion for reconsideration. Our review of the record and the district court's opinions discloses no abuse of discretion and that these appeals are without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Borromeo, Nos. CA-92-902; CR-89-241 (S.D.W. Va. Feb. 3, 1993; Mar. 5, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
