James Earl Holston, Petitioner-appellant, v. State of North Carolina, Respondent-appellee, 8 F.3d 818 (4th Cir. 1993)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 8 F.3d 818 (4th Cir. 1993) Submitted: July 16, 1993. Decided: October 19, 1993

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (CA-92-768-BO)

James Earl Holston, Appellant Pro Se.

Clarence Joe DelForge, III, Office of the Attorney General of North Carolina, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

E.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before NIEMEYER, HAMILTON, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:


James Earl Holston appeals from the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.*  Holston v. State of North Carolina, No. CA-92-768-BO (E.D.N.C. Apr. 23, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

 *

We deny Holston's Motion for Judicial Notice and note that the information contained in the motion would not affect the disposition of his case

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.