David Lee Bender, Plaintiff-appellant, v. M. Feryance; G. Moreno; S. Bonaccorso; Fredrick Brown;thomas Shockley; B. Samples, B. Samples;cervantes; Theodore White, Defendants-appellees, 79 F.3d 1152 (9th Cir. 1996)

 Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 79 F.3d 1152 (9th Cir. 1996) Submitted March 12, 1996. *Decided March 18, 1996

Before: GOODWIN, WIGGINS, and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM** 

California prisoner David Lee Bender appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in favor of defendants in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. He contends the district court erred when it denied him relief. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Kruso v. International Tel. & Tel. Corp., 872 F.2d 1416, 1421 (9th Cir. 1989), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 937 (1990), and affirm.

Bender contends that defendants conspired to violate his constitutional rights by: wrongfully charging him with assault on staff; denying him due process at the rules violation hearing; imposing a time-credit loss of 150 days; placing him in administrative segregation for eighteen months; and denying him therapy. We disagree for the reasons stated by the district court.

AFFIRMED.

 *

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4

 **

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.