William C. Blankstyn, Plaintiff-appellant, v. United States of America, Defendant-appellee, 79 F.3d 1152 (9th Cir. 1996)

 Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 79 F.3d 1152 (9th Cir. 1996) Submitted March 12, 1996. *Decided March 18, 1996

Before: GOODWIN, WIGGINS, and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM** 

William C. Blankstyn appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment for the United States, following a limited remand from this court, in his action to quiet title under 28 U.S.C. § 2410 and for wrongful disclosure of tax return information under 26 U.S.C. § 7431. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. In light of Blankstyn's failure to pay monetary sanctions previously imposed by this court for filing a frivolous appeal, we grant the government's motion to dismiss. See Hymes v. United States, 993 F.2d 701, 702 (9th Cir. 1993).

DISMISSED.1 

 *

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4

 **

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

 1

Blankstyn's motion to file an opposition to the government's motion to dismiss is granted. Blankstyn's opposition is ordered filed

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.