Notice: First Circuit Local Rule 36.2(b)6 States Unpublished Opinions May Be Cited Only in Related Cases.lawrence R. Homo, Sr., Plaintiff, Appellant, v. Town of Henniker, et al., Defendants, Appellees, 78 F.3d 577 (1st Cir. 1996)
Annotate this CaseLawrence R. Homo on brief pro se.
David P. Slawsky on brief for appellees.
Before TORRUELLA, Chief Judge, SELYA and CYR, Circuit Judges.
Per Curiam.
We find no merit in plaintiff's contention that he was denied a full and fair opportunity to present his arguments in his state court actions. The state court's failure to accord him a hearing in his 1994 state court law suit does not preclude the application of res judicata principles.
We affirm substantially for the reasons stated in the district court's July 6, 1995 opinion. Plaintiff's challenge to his arrest and prosecution were so closely related to the subjects of his state court action that plaintiff was required to present all his challenges in one action. Restatement (Second) of Judgments § 24 (1982). See 1st Cir. R. 27.1.
Affirmed.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
