Otto Graham, Petitioner--appellant, v. Robert Furlong; Attorney General of the State of Colorado,respondents--appellees, 76 F.3d 392 (10th Cir. 1996)
Annotate this CaseBefore PORFILIO, McKAY, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.
ORDER AND JUDGMENT*
After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. 34.1.9. The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
This is a petition for writ of habeas corpus challenging the length of petitioner's state court sentence. The district court order dismissing the petition is affirmed for the reasons contained in the magistrate judge's recommendation and the trial court's order adopting the recommendation.
AFFIRMED. The mandate shall issue forthwith.
This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
