Felipe Flores, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Melvin Coley, County of Tulare; James G. Line, Defendants-appellants, 76 F.3d 386 (9th Cir. 1995)

Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 76 F.3d 386 (9th Cir. 1995) Argued and Submitted Nov. 14, 1995. Decided Dec. 5, 1995

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California (Fresno); No. CV-93-05027-REC, Edward Dean Price, Judge, Presiding.

E.D. Cal.

REVERSED.

Before: SCHROEDER and ALARCON, Circuit Judges, and PANNER,*  Senior District Judge

AMENDED MEMORANDUM** 

The district court granted a mistrial because it concluded that the explanation given by Tulare County Attorney James G. Line for attempting to exercise a peremptory challenge against a Hispanic juror was insufficient to demonstrate that she was biased or prejudiced. The court imposed a sanction of $1,192.50 to cover the cost of summoning the jury panel.

It appears from the record that the district court believed that granting a mistrial was compelled by Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79 (1986). We disagree. The proper remedy under these circumstances would have been to deny the peremptory challenge against the Hispanic juror. Accordingly, it was unnecessary to declare a mistrial and discharge the jury. We conclude therefore that it was inappropriate to sanction Mr. Line and order him to pay the cost of summoning the jury because of the court's error.

REVERSED.

 *

Honorable Owen M. Panner, Senior United States District Judge, for the District of Oregon, sitting by designation

 **

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.