Federal Reporter, 3rd Series, Volume 75 (75 F.3d)

United States of America, Appellee, v. Dean J. Smith, Appellant
Date: January 31, 1996
Citation: 75 F.3d 382

Susan Thorsted, a Registered Voter of the State Ofwashington; William First; Timothy S. Zenk; Margaretcolony; League of Women Voters of Washington; Georgecheek; John Clute; Thomas Foley,plaintiffs-appellees-cross-appellants, v. Ralph Munro; Christine O. Gregoire,defendants-appellants-cross-appellees,limit, Sponsor of Initiative 573; Sherry Bochwinkel,defendants-intervenors-appellants-cross-appellees,andu.s. Term Limits; Alan M. Gottlieb; Lee Gill; Wilbur B.mcpherson, Defendants-intervenors.susan Thorsted, a Registered Voter of the State Ofwashington; William First; Timothy S. Zenk; Margaretcolony; League of Women Voters of Washington; Georgecheek; John Clute; Thomas Foley, Plaintiffs-appellees, v. Ralph Munro; Christine O. Gregoire, Defendants,limit, Sponsor of Initiative 573; Sherry Bochwinkel; U.s.term Limits; Alan M. Gottlieb; Lee Gill; Wilburb. Mcpherson, Defendants-intervenors,andcitizens for Term Limits, Intervenor-defendant-appellant.susan Thorsted, a Registered Voter of the State Ofwashington; William First; Timothy S. Zenk; Margaretcolony; League of Women Voters of Washington; Georgecheek; John Clute; Thomas Foley, Plaintiffs-appellees, v. Ralph Munro; Christine O. Gregoire, Defendants-appellants,andlimit, Sponsor of Initiative 573; Sherry Bochwinkel; U.s.term Limits; Alan M. Gottlieb; Lee Gill; Wilburb. Mcpherson, Defendants-intervenors.susan Thorsted, a Registered Voter of the State Ofwashington; William First; Timothy S. Zenk, Plaintiffs,andmargaret Colony; League of Women Voters of Washington;george Cheek; John Clute; Thomas Foley,plaintiffs-appellants, v. Ralph Munro; Christine Gregoire, Defendants-appellees,andlimit, Sponsor of Initiative 573; Sherry Bochwinkel; U.s.term Limits; Alan M. Gottlieb; Lee Gill; Wilburb. Mcpherson, Defendants-intervenors-appellees.susan Thorsted, a Registered Voter of the State Ofwashington; Timothy S. Zenk; William First,plaintiffs-appellants,andmargaret Colony; League of Women Voters of Washington;george Cheek; John Clute; Thomas Foley, Plaintiffs, v. Ralph Munro; Christine Gregoire, Defendants-appellees,limit, Sponsor of Initiative 573; Sherry Bochwinkel;u.s. Term Limits; Alan M. Gottlieb; Lee Gill;wilbur B. Mcpherson,defendants-intervenors-appellees
Date: January 30, 1996
Citation: 75 F.3d 454

In Re City of Mobile, Petitioner
Date: January 31, 1996
Citation: 75 F.3d 605

United States of America, Appellee, v. Mark Albritton, Appellant
Date: February 20, 1996
Citation: 75 F.3d 709

United States Court of Appeals,second Circuit
Date: January 25, 1996
Citation: 75 F.3d 801

In Re American Medical Systems, Inc.; Pfizer, Inc., Petitioners
Date: February 15, 1996
Citation: 75 F.3d 1069

96 Cal. Daily Op. Ser v. 671, 96 Daily Journald.a.r. 1017the People of the State of California; Public Utilitiescommission of the State of California; Petitioners,pennsylvania Public Utility Commission ("papuc"); Southerncalifornia Coalition on Battered Women; Toward Utility Ratenormalization ("turn"); Consumer Federation of America;consumer Action; the National Association of Social Workers("nasw"); the California Alliance Against Domesticviolence; the Family Violence Prevention Fund;petitioners-intervenors, v. Federal Communications Commission; United States Ofamerica; Respondents,us West Communications; Mci Telecommunications Corporation;ad Hoc Telecommunications Users Committee ("committee");at & T Corporation; the National Association of Regulatoryutility Commissioners; National Association of Consumeradvocates (nasuca), Ameritech Operating Companies;southwestern Bell Telephone Company; Pacific Bell; Unitedstates Telephone Association (usta); Bellsouth Corporation;respondents-intervenors.the People of the State of California; Public Utilitiescommission of the State of California; Petitioners,consumer Federation of America; Southern Californiacoalition on Battered Women; National Association Ofregulatory Utility Commissioners ("naruc"); Toward Utilityrate Normalization ("turn"); California Alliance Againstdomestic Violence; the Family Violence Prevention Fund("fund"); Consumer Action; National Association of Socialworkers ("nasw") and the Pennsylvania Public Utilitycommission ("papuc"); Petitioners-intervenors, v. Federal Communications Commission; United States Ofamerica; Respondents,bellsouth Telecommunications, Inc. ("bellsouth");southwestern Bell Telephone Company; National Telephonecooperative Association; Gte California Incorporated(hereinafter "gtec"); Mci Telecommunications Corporation;the United States Telephone Association ("usta"); Us Westcommunications; Ad Hoc Telecommunications Users Committee;respondents-intervenors.at & T Corporation, Petitioners,mci Telecommunications Corporation; Consumer Federation Ofamerica; Consumer Action; National Association of Socialworkers; California Alliance Against Domestic Violence;the Family Violence Prevention Fund; Southern Californiacoalition of Battered Women; Petitioners-intervenors, v. Federal Communications Commission; United States Ofamerica; Respondents,southwestern Bell Telephone Company ("southwestern Bell");national Telephone Cooperative Association; Bell Atlantictelephone Companies ("bell Atlantic"); Ameritech; Gteservice Corporation ("gte"); Respondents-intervenors.competitive Telecommunications Association; Petitioner,consumer Federation of America, California Alliance Againstdomestic Violence & the Family Violence Preventionfund; Petitioners-intervenors, v. Federal Communications Commission; United States Ofamerica; Respondents
Date: January 31, 1996
Citation: 75 F.3d 1350

Nos. 94-1285, 94-1290
Date: June 7, 1996
Citation: 75 F.3d 1470