United States of America, Plaintiff--appellee, v. Barry Stanley Washington, Defendant--appellant, 74 F.3d 1234 (4th Cir. 1996)
Annotate this CaseBarry Stanley Washington, Appellant Pro Se.
Robert Michael Hamilton, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the magistrate judge's order denying his motion for transcripts and his motion for appointment of counsel.* We have reviewed the record and the magistrate judge's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. United States v. Washington, No. CR-92-296-1-WS (M.D.N.C. May 22, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
The magistrate judge was authorized to enter the order in this matter. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) (1) (A) (1988)
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
