Herman E. Harston, Plaintiff-appellant, v. P.l. Huffman; Jimmy L. Hylton, Defendants-appellees.herman E. Harston, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Chris Peterson; Principal Umberger; Mr. St. John,defendants-appellees, 74 F.3d 1231 (4th Cir. 1996)
Annotate this CaseHerman E. Harston, Appellant Pro Se. Martha Murphey Parrish, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, VA; Peter Duane Vieth, Wooten & Hart, P.C., Roanoke, VA, for Appellees.
Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
In these consolidated appeals Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaints. We have reviewed the records and the district court's opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Harston v. Huffman, No. CA-94-788-R; Harston v. Peterson, No. CA-94-175 (W.D. Va. July 11, 1995; June 15, 1995, and Oct. 10, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
