James A. Butler, Plaintiff--appellant, v. Howard C. Vick, Ausa, Defendant--appellee,andjohn Doe, Agents, Defendants, 72 F.3d 126 (4th Cir. 1995)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 72 F.3d 126 (4th Cir. 1995) Submitted Nov. 7, 1995. Decided Dec. 15, 1995

James A. Butler, Appellant Pro Se.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge. (CA-95-12-MC, CR-91-44)

Before WILKINS, HAMILTON, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:


Appellant appeals from the district court's orders dismissing his Bivens*  action and denying his motion to reconsider the dismissal order. We have reviewed the record and the district court's orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Butler v. Vick, No. CA-95-12-MC (E.D. Va. May 31 & June 21, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

 *

Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 395 (1971)

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.