Barry Clinton Johnson, Petitioner-appellant, v. Warden, Buckingham Correctional Center, Respondent-appellee, 7 F.3d 224 (4th Cir. 1993)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond.
Barry Clinton Johnson, Appellant Pro Se.
Robert B. Condon, Assistant Attorney General, for Appellee.
E.D. Va.
DISMISSED.
Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
OPINION
Barry Clinton Johnson appeals from the magistrate judge's order denying him relief in his civil suit.* Our review of the record and the magistrate judge's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. Johnson v. Warden, Buckingham Correctional Center, No. CA-91-702-3 (E.D. Va. June 15, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
The magistrate judge construed Johnson's claim as a claim pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988); however, we conclude that the claim is more appropriately reviewed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) and proceeded accordingly
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
