Roy M. Mcdonald, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Joseph P. Sacchet; Richard Lanham; Katherine Rockwood,defendants-appellees, 7 F.3d 224 (4th Cir. 1993)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 7 F.3d 224 (4th Cir. 1993) Submitted: July 29, 1993. Decided: September 22, 1993

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.

Roy M. McDonald, Appellant Pro Se.

D. Md.

AFFIRMED.

Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:


OPINION

Roy M. McDonald appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988). Our review of the record discloses that this appeal is without merit. The district court entered a dismissal, apparently pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b) (6) for failure to state a claim, and ordered judgment entered in favor of the Defendants. Without reaching the propriety of entering a Rule 12(b) (6) order without notice and before serving process on the adverse party, we affirm this order as a dismissal of a frivolous complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) (1988). We also modify the order pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2106 (1988) to reflect that the dismissal is without prejudice and that judgment is not entered in favor of any party. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.