Mollie M. Badger, Plaintiff-appellant, v. New Hanover School Board of Education; Ray Funderburk,chairman; Ann D. King, Vice Chairman; Janice A. Cavenaugh;rachel Freeman; George D. Hardee, Jr.; Lucille T. Shaffer;robert Toplin; Justine Lerch, Principal; Aldermanelementary School; E. L. Clark, Assistant Superintendent;tom Mcneel, Superintendent; Sandra Mcclain, Assistantprincipal, Alderman Elementary School, Defendants-appellees.mollie M. Badger, Plaintiff-appellant, v. New Hanover School Board of Education; Ray Funderburk,chairman; Ann D. King, Vice Chairman; Janice A. Cavenaugh;rachel Freeman; George D. Hardee, Jr.; Lucille T. Shaffer;robert Toplin; Justine Lerch, Principal; Aldermanelementary School; E. L. Clark, Assistant Superintendent;tom Mcneel, Superintendent; Sandra Mcclain, Assistantprincipal, Alderman Elementary School, Defendants-appellees, 7 F.3d 222 (4th Cir. 1993)

 Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 7 F.3d 222 (4th Cir. 1993) Submitted: August 30, 1993. Decided: September 27, 1993

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Chief District Judge. (CA-91-123-CIV-7)

Mollie M. Badger, Appellant Pro Se.

Sharon Hartman Spence, Maupin, Taylor, Ellis & Adams, P.A., Raleigh, North Carolina; William Lanier Hill, II, Hogue, Hill, Jones, Nash & Lynch, Wilmington, North Carolina, for Appellees.

E.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before HAMILTON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

OPINION

Mollie M. Badger appeals from the district court's orders dismissing her civil rights complaint, No. 92-2187, and denying her motion to correct the record, No. 93-1093.*  Our review of the record and the district court's opinions discloses that these appeals are without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Badger v. New Hanover Sch. Bd. of Educ., No. CA-91-123CIV-7 (E.D.N.C. Aug. 24, 1992 & Nov. 20, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

 *

The two cases were consolidated on appeal

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.