Paul A. Wright, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Howard Anderson; Kenneth Ducharme; James Evans,defendants-appellants,andveronica Rebiero, Defendant, 67 F.3d 311 (9th Cir. 1995)

Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 67 F.3d 311 (9th Cir. 1995) Submitted Sept. 18, 1995. *Decided Sept. 29, 1995

Before: BROWNING, GOODWIN, and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges.


MEMORANDUM** 

Superintendent of the Washington State Reformatory Kenneth DuCharme, Correctional Unit Supervisor Howard Anderson, and Correctional Unit Supervisor James Evans appeal the district court's orders denying their motion for summary judgment based on qualified immunity and denying their motion for reconsideration, in inmate Paul Wright's action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Wright asserts that the defendants violated his First and Fourteenth Amendment rights by placing him in segregation and transferring him to the Washington State Penitentiary in retaliation for speaking out at an inmate meeting for enforcement of an order and consent decree requiring single bunking of inmates.

Because the district court denied summary judgment based on the existence of a genuine issue of fact for trial, we lack jurisdiction. See Johnson v. Jones, 115 S. Ct. 2151 (1995).

DISMISSED.

 *

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4

 **

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.