United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Anthony Scott, Defendant-appellant, 67 F.3d 310 (9th Cir. 1995)

Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 67 F.3d 310 (9th Cir. 1995) Submitted Sept. 18, 1995. *Decided Sept. 25, 1995

Before: BROWNING, GOODWIN, and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges.


MEMORANDUM** 

Anthony Scott appeals his sentence under the Sentencing Guidelines imposed following his guilty plea to bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, United States v. Gallegos-Gonzalez, 3 F.3d 325, 328 (9th Cir. 1993), and affirm.

Scott challenges his designation as a career offender. He contends that the district court erred by treating his prior convictions for controlled substance possessions as unrelated under U.S.S.G. Secs. 4A1.2 and 4B1.1. The district court properly determined that his prior convictions were unrelated because the offenses were separated by an intervening arrest. See U.S.S.G. Sec. 4A1.2 comment. (n. 3); Gallegos-Gonzalez, 3 F.3d at 328.

AFFIRMED.

 *

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4

 **

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.