Notice: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) States That Citation of Unpublished Dispositions is Disfavored Except for Establishing Res Judicata, Estoppel, or the Law of the Case and Requires Service of Copies of Cited Unpublished Dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.austen O. Nwanze, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Tepper Brothers; Ronald Lewis; B & L Properties,defendants-appellees, 67 F.3d 296 (4th Cir. 1995)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 67 F.3d 296 (4th Cir. 1995) Submitted Sept. 6, 1995. Decided Sept. 22, 1995

Austen O. Nwanze, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Bruce Brown, WELLS, PARIS, BLANK & BROWN, Richmond, Virginia; Robert Henry Smallenberg, AYERS & STOLTE, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Before WILKINS and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:


Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing this diversity action alleging breach of contract. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Nwanze v. Tepper Bros., No. CA-94-33 (E.D. Va. Jan. 20, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.