Olusesan Adesanya, Petitioner-appellant, v. K.w. Prunty, Chief Deputy Warden; Attorney General for Thestate of California, Respondents-appellees, 66 F.3d 334 (9th Cir. 1995)
Annotate this CaseBefore: GOODWIN, WIGGINS, and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges.
MEMORANDUM**
Olusesan Adesanya, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the denial of his habeas corpus petition. Adesanya contends the trial court erred by admitting a tape recording made by the victim in which he admitted raping her and by not giving reasons for imposing a consecutive two-year term on count 2 and an eight-year term on count 3. Having conducted a de novo review, Taylor v. Kincheloe, 920 F.2d 599, 601 (9th Cir. 1990), we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
AFFIRMED.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4. We therefore deny Adesanya's request for oral argument
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
