Notice: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) States That Citation of Unpublished Dispositions is Disfavored Except for Establishing Res Judicata, Estoppel, or the Law of the Case and Requires Service of Copies of Cited Unpublished Dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.jose Jesus Nuesslein, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Doctor David Haines; Elizabeth Panaguiton, Pa; Bureau Ofprisons, Defendants-appellees, 66 F.3d 316 (4th Cir. 1995)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 66 F.3d 316 (4th Cir. 1995) Submitted Aug. 24, 1995. Decided Sept. 18, 1995

Jose Jesus Nuesslein, Appellant Pro Se.

Before WIDENER, HALL, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:


Jose Nuesslein appeals the dismissal without prejudice of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. Nuesslein's complaint was dismissed without prejudice to his right to file a proper claim alleging facts showing that his constitutional rights were violated. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders. 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1988); FED. R. CIV. P . 54(b). Because Nuesslein may be able to save this action by amending his complaint, the dismissal order that Nuesslein seeks to appeal is not an appealable final order. See Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064 (4th Cir. 1993). Accordingly, we deny Nuesslein's motion for appointment of counsel, and we dismiss the appeal.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.