Notice: First Circuit Local Rule 36.2(b)6 States Unpublished Opinions May Be Cited Only in Related Cases.anthony Solimine, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. United States of America, et al., Defendants, Appellees, 64 F.3d 654 (1st Cir. 1995)

Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit - 64 F.3d 654 (1st Cir. 1995) Aug. 29, 1995

Anthony Solimine on brief pro se.

Donald K. Stern, United States Attorney, and David S. Mackey, Assistant United States Attorney, on brief for appellees.

Before TORRUELLA, Chief Judge, and SELYA and LYNCH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.


The underlying district court action and this appeal are essentially identical to appellant's other district court complaints and previous appeals in Solimine v. F.B.I., Nos. 94-1873; 94-1995 (1st Cir. Mar. 24, 1995). As we noted therein, the underlying action is frivolous as it is based on "an indisputably meritless legal theory." Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 327 (1989).

Appellant's motion for oral argument is denied.

We summarily affirm for the reasons stated in the district court's memorandum and order of dismissal dated September 21, 1994. Loc. R. 27.1.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.