Stuart H. Hirsh, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Justices of the Supreme Court of the State of California:malcolm L. Lucas; Edward Panelli; Joyce Kennard; Armandarabian; Marvin Baxter; Ronald M. George; and Danlungren, State Attorney General & Acting Personally for Hisprivate Appointee's Financial Gain; State Bar Ofcalifornia; Ellen R. Peck, Employee of the State Bar As Aclaimed Judge; David C. Carr, Employee Prosecutor of Statebar Association, Defendants-appellees.ralph F. Server, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Supreme Court of the State of California; State Bar Ofcalifornia, Defendants-appellees.harold Lenard Perry, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Justices of the Supreme Court of the State of California:malcolm Lucas, Chief; Edward Panelli; Stanley Mosk; Joycekennard; Armand Arabian; Marvin Baxter; Ronald George;and Dan Lungren; Lise Perlman, et al., Defendants-appellees.edmundo B. Espinoza, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Malcolm Lucas, Honorable, Justices of the Supreme Court Ofthe State of California; Kathryn Mickle; Stanley Mosk;joyce Kennard; Armand Arabian; Marvin Baxter; Ronaldgeorge; and Dan Lungren, State Attorney General,defendants-appellees, 61 F.3d 911 (9th Cir. 1995)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 61 F.3d 911 (9th Cir. 1995) Argued & Submitted March 7, 1995. Decided March 29, 1995

NOTE: THE COURT HAS WITHDRAWN THIS OPINION

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.