United States of America, Plaintiff--appellee, v. John Richard Carlucci, Defendant--appellant, 60 F.3d 825 (4th Cir. 1995)
Annotate this CaseJohn Richard Carlucci, appellant pro se. David Earl Godwin, Assistant United States Attorney, Wheeling, WV, for appellee.
N.D.W. Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before HALL, MURNAGHAN, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion as successive and an abuse of the writ. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Carlucci, Nos. CR86-26; CA-94-37 (N.D.W. Va. June 6, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
