Ralph Seagle, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Grant Spicer; Herb Myers; Scott Hamby, Defendants-appellees.ralph Seagle, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Grant Spicer; Herb Myers; Scott Hamby, Defendants--appellees, 60 F.3d 824 (4th Cir. 1995)

Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 60 F.3d 824 (4th Cir. 1995) Submitted May 18, 1995Decided June 29, 1995

Ralph Seagle, Appellant Pro Se.

Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:


Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Seagle v. Spicer, No. CA-95-44-4 (W.D.N.C. Feb. 28 & Apr. 6, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.