Martin J. Reilly, Plaintiff--appellant, v. David G. Gray, Individually; Westall, Gray, Kimel Andconnolly, a Professional Association in Thepractice of Law, Defendants--appellees, 60 F.3d 824 (4th Cir. 1995)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 60 F.3d 824 (4th Cir. 1995) Submitted: June 22, 1995. Decided: July 7, 1995

Martin J. Reilly, appellant pro se. David G. Gray, Jr., Westall, Gray, Kimel & Connolly, Asheville, NC, for appellees.

W.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before HALL, MURNAGHAN, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:


Appellant appeals from the district court's order granting Defendants' motion for summary judgment on Appellant's state law contract and attorney malpractice claims. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Reilly v. Gray, No. CA-91-161-1 (W.D.N.C. Aug. 3, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.