United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Jaime Rivera-reyes, Defendant-appellant, 59 F.3d 168 (4th Cir. 1995)

Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 59 F.3d 168 (4th Cir. 1995) Submitted: May 18, 1995. Decided: June 26, 1995

Jaime Rivera-Reyes, appellant pro se. Rachel Celia Ballow, Office of the United States Attorney, Alexandria, VA, for appellee.

Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:


Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion and his motion for reconsideration of that order. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and orders, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Rivera-Reyes, Nos. CR-92-74; CA-94-1324-AM (E.D. Va. Jan. 6 and 18, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.