King Instruments Corporation, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Luciano Perego and Tapematic, Defendant/cross-appellants, 59 F.3d 163 (Fed. Cir. 1995)
Annotate this CaseDavid J. Brezner, Richard F. Trecartin and Richard P. Doyle, Jr., Flehr, Hohbach, Test, Albritton & Herbert, San Francisco, CA, were on the brief for plaintiff-appellant. Also on the brief was Nicholas A. Pandiscio, Schiller, Pandiscio & Kusmer, of Cambridge, MA, of counsel.
Edgar H. Haug, Adam L. Brookman and Mary Ann G. Mullen, Curtis, Morris & Safford, P.C., New York City, were on the brief for defendant/cross-appellants.
Before ARCHER, Chief Judge, RICH, NIES, NEWMAN, MAYER, MICHEL, PLAGER, LOURIE, CLEVENGER, RADER, SCHALL, and BRYSON, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
The appeals, having originally been submitted to a panel of the court and, thereafter, it having been ordered that the appeals should be decided en banc,
IT IS ORDERED that the appeals shall be decided by the panel to which they were originally submitted.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
