Linwood Earl Chandler, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Samuel L. Batts; J. Hite, Correctional Officer; T.e.rooks, Sergeant; M.d. Hines, Sergeant,defendants-appellees, 57 F.3d 1065 (4th Cir. 1995)
Annotate this CaseLinwood Earl Chandler, Appellant Pro Se.
E.D. Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Chandler v. Batts, No. CA-94-1224-AM (E.D. Va. Dec. 2, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.*
AFFIRMED.
We deny Appellant's "Emergency Motion for Immediate Injunctive Relief" in which he requests that we place the case in abeyance and transfer him to another prison. We also deny Appellant's "Motion to Reconvene and for the appointment of counsel."
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
