Charles Edward Turner, A/k/a Paul William Scott, Petitioner-appellant, v. Edward W. Murray, Director, Virginia Department Ofcorrections, Respondent-appellee, 56 F.3d 62 (4th Cir. 1995)

Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 56 F.3d 62 (4th Cir. 1995) Submitted Dec. 20, 1994. Decided May 25, 1995

Charles Edward Turner, appellant pro se. Mark Ralph Davis, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, VA, for appellee.

Before HALL and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:


Appellant seeks to appeal the magistrate judge's order*  denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) petition. Our review of the record and the magistrate judge's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. Turner v. Murray, No. CA-94-55 (E.D. Va. Aug. 19, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

 *

The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (1988)

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.