Rodney Guy Greene, Plaintiff--appellant, v. United States of America; Carolyn v. Rickards, Warden,defendants--appellees, 56 F.3d 61 (4th Cir. 1995)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 56 F.3d 61 (4th Cir. 1995) Submitted: April 20, 1995Decided: May 30, 1995

Rodney Guy Greene, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Parker, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, VA, for Appellee.

Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:


Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his petition for mandamus relief, which the court construed as a petition for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1988). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Greene v. United States, No. CA-94-644-AM (E.D. Va. Dec. 14, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.