Dalton L. Lewis, Plaintiff--appellant, v. Michael T.w. Bell; Tin T. Le, Doctor, Defendants--appellees,andnurse Rebbie, Defendant, 56 F.3d 61 (4th Cir. 1995)
Annotate this CaseDalton L. Lewis, Appellant Pro Se. James Peeler Smith, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and its order dismissing one defendant for lack of service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(j), and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm both orders on the reasoning of the district court. Lewis v. Bell, No. CA-93-513-5-CT-BR (E.D.N.C. May 20 and Dec. 29, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
