United States of America v. Andrew K. Peay, Appellant, 55 F.3d 685 (D.C. Cir. 1995)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit - 55 F.3d 685 (D.C. Cir. 1995) April 19, 1995

Before: Williams, Randolph, and Tatel, Circuit Judges.


JUDGMENT

Per Curiam

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the memoranda filed by the parties. The court has determined that the issues presented occasion no need for an opinion. See D.C. Cir. Rule 14(c). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court's denial of release be affirmed substantially for the reasons stated by the district court at the February 22, 1995 motions hearing. The district court's findings regarding appellant's dangerousness to the community are not clearly erroneous. See United States v. Weissberger, 951 F.2d 392, 399 (D.C. Cir. 1991).

The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C. Cir. Rule 41.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.