United States of America, Appellee, v. Pluria Rice, Appellant, 52 F.3d 331 (8th Cir. 1995)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit - 52 F.3d 331 (8th Cir. 1995) Submitted: Apr. 11, 1995Filed: Apr. 27, 1995

Before FAGG, MAGILL, and BEAM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.


After pleading guilty to a drug-related offense, Pluria Rice appeals her guidelines sentence. Rice contends she was entitled to an order compelling the Government to move for a substantial assistance departure. We disagree. Rice did not show the Government breached the written plea agreement or unconstitutionally withheld the motion. See United States v. Kelly, 18 F.3d 612, 617-18 (8th Cir. 1994). Rice's remaining arguments are foreclosed by the court's contrary holdings in United States v. Wheeler, 972 F.2d 927, 929 (8th Cir. 1992), and United States v. Clary, 34 F.3d 709, 713-14 (8th Cir. 1994), cert. denied, 115 S. Ct. 1172 (1995). We affirm.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.